SCOTUS rules Colorado cannot remove Trump from ballot
- Bias Rating
56% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
90% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-49% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
11% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
50% : The case is Trump v. Anderson.39% : The case originated in Colorado after four Republican and two unaffiliated voters petitioned to force Secretary of State Jena Griswold to bar Trump from the ballot under state elections law.
34% : While the unsigned majority ruling concluded states may not remove presidential candidates absent congressional authorization, the justices did not dispute, or even address, the conclusion from Colorado's state courts that Trump engaged in insurrection.
27% : The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday told Colorado it could not use its election laws and judiciary to disqualify Donald Trump from the presidential primary ballot, overturning a contrary decision by the state Supreme Court in December.
21% : The Colorado Supreme Court, by 4-3, agreed with them and declared Trump constitutionally ineligible late last year.
20% : The petitioners alleged Trump was ineligible to hold office under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which was ratified in the wake of the Civil War.
16% : Although Trump's name remained on the state's ballot, it was an open question what would happen with votes cast for Trump in the event the nation's highest court found him ineligible to hold office.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.