Supreme Court rules for Trump in ballot case -- but experts say it opens door to "crisis" if he wins
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-56% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
16% Positive
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : Colorado's Supreme Court ruled that the provision could be applied to Trump given his actions on January 6, 2021.45% : "We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office."
41% : "Yes the Supreme Court ruled for Trump based on only Congress having the power to enforce the 14th amendment," tweeted CNN legal analyst Norm Eisen.
40% : "Why can Georgia keep some third parties off the ballot that are allowed in other states, for example?"Some legal experts believe that the Supreme Court's reasoning could "leave the door open to a renewed fight over trying to use the provision to disqualify Trump in the event he wins the election.
38% : Though the court ruled 9-0 that Colorado cannot remove Trump from the ballot, only five of the justices held that the only way to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is through Congressional action, court expert Steve Vladeck explained, while four of the justices would have stopped at barring a state from disqualifying a presidential candidate.
34% : "The ruling puts an end to efforts to remove Trump from the ballot in the state as well as similar efforts in Illinois and Maine.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.