Signs Of The Times Article Rating

Supreme Court rules states can't kick Trump off the ballot

Mar 04, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    60% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    65% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    90% Very Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -46% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

49% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

64% : Minutes after the ruling, Trump hailed the decision in an all-capital-letters post on his social media site, writing, "Big win for America!!!
53% : States retain the power to bar people running for state office from appearing on the ballot under Section 3.
51% : In accordance with this decision, Donald Trump is an eligible candidate on Colorado's 2024 Presidential Primary.
50% : The provision prohibits those who previously held government positions but later "engaged in insurrection" from running for various offices.
44% : "The Supreme Court decision removes one avenue to holding Trump accountable for his role in challenging the 2020 election results, including his exhortation that his supporters should march on the Capitol on Jan. 6, when Congress was about to formalize Joe Biden's win.
41% : "In addition to ensuring that Trump remains on the ballot in Colorado, the decision will end similar cases that have arisen.
35% : They said the decision could "insulate" Trump from "future controversy," adding that the ruling "shuts the door on other potential means of federal enforcement" of section 3.Conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett agreed that the court went further than required, although she did not join the liberal justices' opinion.
28% : The state high court's decision reversed a lower court's ruling in which a judge said that Trump had engaged in insurrection by inciting the Jan. 6 riot but that presidents are not subject to the insurrection clause of the 14th Amendment because they are not an "officer of the United States.
25% : In an unsigned ruling with no dissents, the court reversed the Colorado Supreme Court, which had determined that Trump could not serve again as president under Section 3 of the Constitution's 14th Amendment.
25% : "Trump and his allies raised that point, as well as other arguments that the 14th Amendment cannot be applied.
22% : They alleged in court papers that Trump "intentionally organized and incited a violent mob to attack the United States Capitol in a desperate attempt to prevent the counting of electoral votes cast against him.
21% : Trump is facing criminal charges for the same conduct.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link