NPR, New York Times are in immense turmoil with the world on the...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

59% : Kahn, after telling the Journal he wants coverage of Trump to be emotion-free, cited a recent piece in his paper as an example of fact-based, fair coverage.
48% : Relentlessly negative coverage of him remains standard fare at both NPR and the Times, but, as I predicted would happen, the lack of basic fairness that polluted coverage of Trump in 2016 has spread to virtually every topic under the sun.
32% : His solution was for key reporters to be freed of rules against giving their opinions, and the paper soon began disparaging Trump relentlessly.
29% : Naturally, much of the rancor revolves around Donald Trump.
27% : "Berliner, making it clear he's not a conservative, writes that he voted against Trump in both 2016 and 2020.
23% : After noting Trump said the Communist leaders were "horrible" and "vicious," but "they put it down with strength," the Times concluded that "his exaltation of the ruthless crushing of democratic protesters is steeped in foreshadowing.
22% : Citing a column by media reporter Jim Rutenberg about the difficulty of covering Trump if you thought he was unfit to be president, Baquet said that column "nailed" his worry.
22% : Yet the story, headlined "Why a Second Trump Presidency May Be More Radical Than His First," begins by resurrecting a remark Trump made in 1990 about how China's leaders crushed the Tiananmen Square protest a year earlier.
22% : The paper routinely accuses Trump and most Republicans of racism and Islamophobia, so perhaps being falsely accused will lead the editors to return to standards of fairness in their coverage of others.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.