New York Post Article RatingTrump trial in tatters after Michael Cohen's 'otherworldly' testimony
- Bias Rating
56% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
35% ReliableAverage
- Policy Leaning
86% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-48% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-29% Negative
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
40% : There will be no dead felony zapped back into life against Cohen, as it was for Trump.37% : Moreover, Cohen admitted that he worked for Trump for years in his murky capacity as a fixer.
29% : The alleged campaign-finance violations allowed Cohen to try to implicate Trump.
28% : However, it is doubtful that Trump could have been convicted on such a charge in any other venue.
24% : Prior witnesses testified that Trump's payments to Cohen were designated as "legal expenses" not by Trump but by his accounting staff.
17% : The completion of the testimony of Michael Cohen left the prosecution of Donald Trump, like its star witness, in tatters.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.