Rally Crowd Smaller Than Trump Claims, Just Like His Wanger

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

59% : At his campaign kickoff in June of 2015, Trump opened by bragging about the "thousands of people" who had turned out to his skyscraper for his big announcement.
51% : Remember when Trump sent ... was it Sean Spicer? ...
40% : There has been a bit of an uptick in recent days of Trump sycophants talking about expanding their electoral map -- Lara Trump has supposedly made noises with her mouth hole about competing in California, but at least she had the decency to not destroy America's eardrums by singing it -- and a rally in the Bronx is presumably part of that strategy.
36% : To which the obvious responses are a) 3,500 people in a city of 8 million that has voted decisively against Trump in the last two elections is not exactly evidence of an incipient groundswell of support, no matter how enthusiastically the nuts waved their red MAGA hats around, so we doubt the Democrats are sweating it, and b) if CNN reporters are that thirsty for some excitement in this campaign, might we suggest reporting on -- oh, spitballing here -- Trump's public plans to end American democracy?
31% : You'd think in the -- God help us -- nine years since then, the media would have learned to not give Trump the benefit of the doubt.
24% : That would indeed be quite a feat, to pull that many people in one of the bluest districts in America, in a city that collectively loathes Donald Trump with the white-hot intensity of a thousand exploding suns.
17% : Honestly, this is the most pathetic Trump rally fluffing we've seen since last week, when his campaign pretended that 100,000 people showed up to hear him babble about Hannibal Lecter on a beach in New Jersey, without mention that approximately 99,990 of them were not there for Trump, but rather because it was a beach in May.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.