Was Donald Trump, as president, a king? The US supreme court thinks so | Moira Donegan
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
55% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-62% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-15% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : In its holding, the court's majority made a flimsy distinction between the immunity they are granting to presidents for "core powers" and "official" acts - terms whose precise meanings they don't define - and the criminal liability that Trump and other presidents still have for "unofficial" acts.43% : In practice, Trump - and any subsequent president, should we ever get to have one - is now unaccountable to either legislative checks or criminal law.
39% : In ruling that Trump enjoys 'absolute immunity' for 'official acts' as president, the court has set a disturbing precedentIs the president a king?
38% : On Monday, in its very last ruling of the term, the chief justice, John Roberts, writing for the court's six conservatives, held in Trump v United States that Donald Trump has "absolute immunity" from criminal prosecution for all acts that can be interpreted as part of the official course of his "core" duties, and "presumptive" immunity for all other official acts.
36% : On the verge of an election in which Trump may well be restored to presidential power, the court has officially declared that he cannot be held accountable for abuses of that power in a criminal court.
36% : They know, as well as we do, that Trump aspires to usher in an era of corruption and autocracy.
32% : What remains of the January 6 prosecution will now be remanded to a lower court, which will be tasked with determining what charges, if any, can proceed against Trump under the court's new, unprecedented vision of executive immunity.
19% : Much of Jack Smith's criminal case against Trump has thereby been voided.
16% : The court said that Trump cannot be charged for some of his "official" actions in the lead-up to the insurrection, including his attempts to pressure Mike Pence and his efforts to weaponize the justice department to force some states to reverse their election results.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.