Opinion: Trump's trials are turning all of us into legal scholars
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
35% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-55% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
4% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : Whatever the outcome for Trump and the presidential election, as a citizenry we are much better off for having the workings of our courts laid out for the education of the American public.49% : Did we know that one person could be convicted 34 times for essentially one cover-up of an alleged fling with a porn star?This Stormy Daniels case also provided an introductory course in ethics, as lawyers for Trump and the district attorney battled over what circumstances required a judge to recuse -- or not -- because he and his law clerk made political contributions to a Democratic opponent of Trump.
39% : Jurors ultimately convicted Trump on 34 counts of falsifying business records, making him a felon.
34% : And when Engoron rendered a judgment against Trump for more than $400 million, TV network commentators (including me on several occasions) were all over the airwaves explaining how any person could suspend enforcement of a state court judgment by obtaining an appeal bond.
32% : We were even reminded that the law has not abandoned the use of mumbo jumbo, when the trial judge, Lewis A. Kaplan, applied the doctrine of "collateral estoppel" in the second Carroll defamation trial, determining that Trump could not relitigate the issue of liability and that the court would only hear arguments about damages.
29% : Meanwhile in D.C. and Florida, charges against Trump in the Jan. 6 case and the classified documents case have led to a basic class in constitutional law, with lessons on presidential powers and the 4th Amendment.
29% : Now that the Supreme Court has declared that the president has substantial immunity from prosecution, how will courts apply that in the pending criminal cases against Trump?
25% : Opinion: The Supreme Court just showed us that Trump is not incompetent.
17% : Gen. Letitia James, accusing Trump of exaggerating his wealth.
12% : Others believe that Trump has been victimized simply because he is Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.