How Jack Smith might get Donald Trump's classified docs charges reinstated

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

46% : Trump praised the ruling, calling for an end to the "Weaponization of our Justice System" in a post on Truth Social.
40% : Some in the legal community did rise to defend Cannon's ruling in the hours that followed, suggesting it could be upheld at the Supreme Court, which recently ruled that portions of the indictment against Trump in his federal election case will have to go based on the doctrine of presidential immunity from prosecution.
38% : When Garland appointed Smith to head investigations into Trump, he said the move underscored the Justice Department's "commitment to both independence and accountability in particularly sensitive matters.
37% : Cannon agreed with Trump, who nominated her for the federal bench, that Smith's appointment in the case violated a provision of the Constitution that requires "Officers of the United States" to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate.
35% : "Even before Monday's decision, Cannon had indefinitely delayed a trial in the case, effectively guaranteeing Trump won't face a verdict before the November election.
34% : That drawn-out timeline may only be relevant if Trump doesn't become president.
28% : It will likely take at least months for that court to get briefs from both Smith and Trump, potentially hold oral arguments, and then issue a decision.
28% : If Trump becomes president in January, questions about the fate of his classified documents case could become moot for years at least.
26% : Trump could - in a move that his opponents would likely call an assault on the rule of law - order the Justice Department to drop the charges, and fire any attorney general who refuses to do so.Could the Supreme Court side with Trump?
24% : "Cannon has previously been strongly rebuffed by Republican-appointed appellate judges in relation to Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.