Trump appeals 'egregious' $454m civil fraud verdict
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-48% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-2% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
39% : "Engoron presided over the civil fraud trial and ruled on February 16 that Trump must pay $355m in penalties after he had "blatantly false financial data" to secure favorable business terms.37% : His lawyers also argued that James, who brought the civil lawsuit against Trump in September 2022, was attempting to facilitate an "unauthorized, unprecedented power grab" and that failing to dismiss the judgement would bestow the attorney general "limitless power to target anyone she desires, including her self-described political opponents".
34% : In April, Trump posted a $175 million bond to delay collection of the judgement and prevent James' office from seizing his assets while he appeals.
21% : The judge also barred Trump from running any New York company for three years, while Eric and Don Jr were barred for two years.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.