Washington Examiner Article RatingDaily on Energy: California wildfire doubles, UN secretary general versus extreme heat, and oral arguments on Vineyard Wind - Washington Examiner
- Bias Rating
-6% Center
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-4% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-21% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : The official outlined a plan to combat heat, with four areas of focus: caring for vulnerable populations, upping protections for workers, boosting the infrastructure of economies to adapt to the heat, and phasing out fossil fuels.52% : "The disease is the addiction to fossil fuels.
45% : The United Nations' Secretary General is launching a global call to action to combat heat - and went as far as to blame fossil fuels for the record-breaking temperatures many countries are experiencing.
42% : In his call to divest from fossil fuels, Guterres called for ending new coal projects and shifting fossil fuel subsidies to renewables while supporting vulnerable countries.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.