Financial Times Article RatingLetter: Azerbaijan's COP29 fund pledge is a distraction
- Bias Rating
-34% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
5% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
-34% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
N/A
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
28% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : Just look at how governments managed to mobilise $16tn in Covid stimulus in the first year of the pandemic.57% : Funding climate action while expanding fossil fuels is like mopping the floor while turning the faucet.
48% : Rich countries can mobilise more than $3tn annually by shifting public money away from fossil fuels, taxing the fossil fuel industry, and changing unfair global finance rules.
44% : The COP29 presidency should instead focus on implementing last year's agreement to transition away from fossil fuels and on reaching a new climate finance target.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.