Trump Warns Harris Would Be 'Very Bad to the Jewish People' as President, Says He Opposes Israel Arms Embargo

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : "During his single term in office, Trump recognized Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights, a strategic region on Israel's northern border previously controlled by Syria.
40% : Trump also noted his administration's efforts to broker the Abraham Accords, which normalized Israel's relations with four Arab countries in 2020.
35% : Harsh US sanctions levied on Iran under Trump crippled the Iranian economy and led its foreign exchange reserves to plummet.
28% : "Look, she's been very, very bad to Israel and very bad to Jewish people," Trump said.
27% : While fielding questions from reporters at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Trump commented on recent reports that Harris would be "open to" considering an arms embargo on Israel if she is elected president in November.
24% : "She's been very, very bad to Israel, and she's been very bad and disrespectful to Jewish people," Trump added.
21% : Trump argued that under his administration, "Iran was broke," weakening the Islamist regime's ability to fund terrorist groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah throughout the Middle East.
19% : Trump added during the press conference that Iran, the arch enemy of Israel, "cannot have a nuclear weapon."
14% : Regardless of the conversation, Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, stated that he would oppose withholding arms from Israel and attacked Harris for her positions on issues of concern to Jewish voters.
12% : Trump and his Republican supporters in the US Congress have criticized the Biden administration for renewing billions of dollars in US sanctions waivers, which had the effect of unlocking frozen funds and allowing the country to access previously inaccessible hard currency.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.