Las Vegas Sun Article Rating

Voter redo: Question 1 approval would allow Nevada Legislature's oversight of Board of Regents

  • Bias Rating

    -2% Center

  • Reliability

    45% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    -2% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    N/A

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

15% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : During a Senate Committee on Legislative Operations and Elections meeting in 2017, Anderson explained that the Board of Regents would still oversee higher education in Nevada, but the Legislature would have the power to pass laws that specifically affect the board under AJR 5.
48% : He likened efforts to get the question back on the ballot to those of "an election denier" and added that it wouldn't improve higher education in the state, workforce development or advanced research.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link