Judge delays Trump sentencing in hush money case

  • Bias Rating

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    50% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -60% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-18% Negative

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

35% : Trump -- fresh from watching appellate arguments in a sexual abuse lawsuit against him in a nearby federal court -- heralded the hush money sentencing delay.
35% : Trump appealed the federal court decision and has asked appeals judges to halt post-conviction proceedings.
34% : In July, a judge dismissed a federal case in Florida charging Trump with illegally hoarding classified documents.
34% : Daniels says she and Trump had a sexual encounter a decade earlier after they met at a celebrity golf tournament in Lake Tahoe.
30% : Trump entered this election year facing the possibility of multiple criminal trials after he was indicted four times since March 2023.
30% : Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen paid Daniels and was later reimbursed by Trump, whose company logged the reimbursements as legal expenses.
29% : Trump is the first ex-president convicted of a crime.
24% : Trump maintains that the stories were false and that the reimbursements were for legal work and logged correctly.
18% : The Supreme Court's immunity decision has ensured significant delays in a separate federal case in Washington, D.C., in which Trump's accused of trying to overturn his 2020 election loss.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link