Lauren Boebert compares Mike Johnson's failed bill to 'Diddy freak off'
- Bias Rating
-50% Medium Liberal
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-24% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-67% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-37% Negative
- Liberal
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : "The SAVE Act is a great bill that would secure our elections from illegal aliens voting in there, require voter ID," Boebert told host Mike Davis, who is filling in for Bannon while he serves a prison sentence.44% : Boebert was one of 14 Republicans who voted against CR, which would have extended government funding for another six months and included the SAVE Act to require voter ID in federal elections.
21% : Representative Thomas Massie went as far as calling Johnson's proposal "insincere and unserious," reflecting a broader tension within the Republican Party, as lawmakers on the right grapple with how to address both fiscal issues and controversial policies like voter ID requirements, while holding only a razor-thin majority in the House.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.