Washington Examiner Article RatingTrump camp hypes up Walz debate skills ahead of Vance showdown - Washington Examiner
- Bias Rating
26% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-18% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
-5% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-3% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
88% : "Trump is set to offer a play-by-play response to the live event on Truth Social between "the Brilliant J.D. Vance and the Highly Inarticulate 'Tampon' Tim Walz," the GOP presidential nominee posted Monday on his social media platform.81% : CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINERSimilarly, Trump played up Vance during his trip to Georgia on Monday, saying his running mate is a "very smart guy" and that he has "done a great job."
43% : Trump wrote.
31% : "2024 VICE PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE: VANCE AND WALZ TO GO TOE-TO-TOE IN CBS CONTESTThe approach is reminiscent to that of Vice President Kamala Harris's campaign before her showdown against Trump earlier this month, when her spokesperson tempered high expectations due to Trump's "constant lies and the lack of fact-checking by the moderators [that] make him difficult to prepare for.
19% : But Trump also downplayed Walz during his remarks, saying he didn't think Walz should have "ever been chosen" and calling him "not qualified.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.