With a debate looming, JD Vance's comments on car seats causing low birthrates and his detesting of Trump emerge: Today in Ohio

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

35% : They just have to keep explaining what the heck he's talking about because this is not on brand for Trump.
33% : And polling data shows that Vance has a higher unfavorable rating compared to Waltz, which could potentially be a liability for Trump.
32% : And he expects Waltz will tout Harris's plans for the country and to point out Trump, advances flaws.
32% : Trump pulls the strings.
26% : And he said Trump has just so thoroughly failed to deliver on his economic populism, accepting a disjointed China policy.
25% : Well, and from what I understand, they're not even going to be fact checking in real time for this debate as they did with Trump and Harris.
24% : Four years ago, he was adamant that Trump was one of the worst leaders ever.
22% : The rest of Ohio's Republican leaders have proven to be cowardly lackeys on this issue, lining up behind Trump just like the way the German leaders lined up behind Hitler.
20% : What did Vance say about Trump as he sought re-election four years ago?
19% : If Trump wins, if he gets on the stage tomorrow night and continues his crazy nonsense, I don't know.
18% : Those are the folks who wouldn't be deterred from voting for Trump, no matter what he said or did, because they share his wretched value system.
18% : But the Republicans want to undermine that in case Trump loses.
16% : We mentioned several times last week that Mike DeWine is the sole Republican doing the right thing when it comes to Springfield and the controversy that Vance and Trump falsely created there.
15% : We mentioned several times last week that Mike DeWine is the sole Republican leader doing the right thing when it comes to Springfield and the controversy that Vance and Trump falsely created there.
5% : Laura, what did Vance say about Trump as Trump sought reelection four years ago?that Trump did not fulfill his promises.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.