Editorial: Vance's debate dodge of a crucial question should be disqualifying for any veep
- Bias Rating
48% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
45% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-42% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-5% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
39% : Those who are still pondering how they will vote Nov. 5 should be clear on this: If and when Trump re-takes office, democracy won't have a Mike Pence around to defend it this time.38% : And, especially, for his assertion that Trump "peacefully gave over power on January the 20th," 2021.
34% : Trump, he noted, "is still saying he didn't lose the election."
28% : Trump has tested those guardrails long enough to know how to potentially knock them down next time.
24% : In his place, a compassionate-conservative-sounding guy who deserves an Emmy for so earnestly delivering up fictional lines about immigrants causing housing shortages, about how Trump "salvaged" Obamacare, about the nonexistent "Kamala Harris administration" causing every societal ill imaginable.
21% : He noted that then-Vice President Pence's responsible decision to certify the 2020 election results -- upholding his constitutional oath even as Trump violated his own -- was the only reason it was Vance rather than Pence on the stage with him.
19% : Trump "lost the election," Walz continued.
12% : Anyone unfamiliar with the kind of campaign Trump is running, and Vance's toxic role in it, might not have recognized the astonishing sane-washing happening on the stage.
8% : "In other words, he would have played along with Trump's scheme to poison the process with fake electors -- a scheme that has already led to numerous felony indictments and is part of the pending federal criminal case against Trump himself for election interference.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.