Pinkerton: What JD Vance's Federal Land Bonanza Means for the 50 States
- Bias Rating
22% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
12% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-10% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
20% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
62% : Referring to oil, Trump said at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee, "We have more liquid gold under our feet than any other country by far.43% : As Trump says, "Make America Rich Again."Needless to say, not every state will want this: Some will bow down to the green gods, prostrating their economy on the altar of eco-austerity.
40% : If Donald Trump and JD Vance win this November, that will be literally a true statement because Trump and Vance want to use federal land to create more housing and wealth for Americans.
40% : (Even the Federal Emergency Management Administration got into the act; FEMA has nothing better to do, eh?)Trump has also called for using federal lands to support a "a new American industrialism."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.