House Finds Secret Service Responsible For 'Preventable' Trump Assassination Attempt
- Bias Rating
42% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-64% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-35% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
40% : One of the key findings of the report concluded that the security perimeter set up by the Secret Service allowed people to get within around 150 yards of the stage where Trump was speaking without going through security screening.37% : MATT WALSH'S 'AM I RACIST?' COMING TO DAILYWIRE+ OCT. 28The officer fell to the ground and radioed out that there was a man with a gun on the roof.
21% : From there, he opened fire, injuring Trump and two rallygoers and killing 50-year-old Corey Comperatore.
17% : The House Task Force on the July 13 assassination attempt in Butler released a 53-page interim report detailing the "stunning security failures" that led to Trump being struck in the ear by a bullet fired by 20-year-old Thomas Matthew Crooks.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.