The Guardian Article RatingTo win, Harris should talk more about working-class needs and less about Trump | Dustin Guastella
- Bias Rating
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
65% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
42% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-7% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-36% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
67% : Trump was already president.61% : We asked respondents to evaluate different political messages that they might hear from Harris and Trump, and to score them on a scale of favorability.
34% : She sounded the alarm about the dire threat Trump poses to "your fundamental freedoms" and how in his second term he would be "essentially immune" from oversight.
23% : It named Trump as "a criminal" and "a convicted felon" and warned of his plans to punish his political enemies.
21% : Much like Harris's recent rhetoric, this message called on voters to "defend our freedom and our democracy" against a would-be dictator in the form of Trump.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.