Los Angeles Times Article Rating

Opinion: The Top 10 reasons to vote for Kamala Harris for president

Oct 27, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Reliability

    50% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -4% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

7% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

62% : As Trump recently warned, when it comes to picking advisors, "I now know the game a little better."
54% : Again, drum roll, and the countdown to No. 1:10.
49% : And in a Wall Street Journal survey, most economists predicted that inflation, interest rates and deficits would be much higher under Trump.
49% : But that's preferable to Trump picking younger clones to serve for decades.2.
49% : Unlike Trump, she would be "a president for all Americans" and "put country above party and self," as she said at the Democratic National Convention.
47% : All told, Harris has more government experience, including in national security (as a Senate Intelligence Committee member as well as vice president), than Presidents Clinton, George W. Bush, Obama and Trump had when they took office.9.
47% : Justice, and justice, would proceed, because the charges against Trump for Jan. 6 and taking classified documents are deserved.
46% : But Harris' agenda of tax and spending policies would cost about half as much as Trump's, according to nonpartisan analyses, and provide a better return on public investment.
43% : "More than 40 former Justice Department officials of both parties have endorsed Harris, saying she'd respect the department's prosecutorial independence, like every president but Trump since Watergate.
39% : Also, Harris would respect the independence of the Federal Reserve; as president, Trump did not.5.
37% : Harris is "a strong, committed public servant ... running to put people together," Republican former Rep. Fred Upton of Michigan said last week, in joining more than 30 former party colleagues in condemning Trump.
37% : Trump not only doesn't recognize the existential threat, he mocks it and vows to repeal the landmark Biden-Harris investments in clean energy.
30% : Neither Harris nor Trump has plans for tackling the unsustainable growth of the federal debt; both would add to it.
19% : They are not, as Trump lies, a result of Democrats' "weaponization" of government.6.
13% : Harris wouldn't treat the Justice Department as her personal law firm, as Trump did and would do again, to fulfill his threats of "retribution."

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link