Robinhood Launches Presidential Election Betting Market Allowing Users To Wager On Harris And Trump
- Bias Rating
-6% Center
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-8% Center
- Politician Portrayal
2% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
33% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
68% : So if the Robinhood market opens with a 62% chance of a Trump win, that means that users could buy Trump contracts at $0.62 apiece and Harris contracts at $0.38, scoring $1 a pop if their pick becomes president, netting a roughly 60% return on investment if Trump wins and 160% if Harris does.51% : That's higher than the poll-based prediction models like FiveThirtyEight's, which gives Trump a 54% chance at victory, and Nate Silver's Silver Bulletin, which prices Trump at 52.9%.
47% : Election betting has become a major talking point this presidential election, earning a shoutout from Trump earlier this month, though the regulator Commodity Futures Trading Commission has expressed concerns the wagers may "threaten election integrity" as voters may be wrongly incentivized to support a certain candidate due to their bets, though a federal court recently ruled against the CFTC in a case against Kalshi.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.