The New York Sun Article Rating

Judge Set To Rule If Trump's Election Win Is Enough To Overturn His Convictions for Stormy Daniels Cover Up

Nov 11, 2024 View Original Article
  • Bias Rating

    22% Somewhat Conservative

  • Reliability

    30% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    50% Medium Conservative

  • Politician Portrayal

    -35% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

-6% Negative

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

59% : That approach, which would involve briefings and proceedings that could stretch on for months, could prove effective for Trump.
49% : The case centered on payments Trump made, via an attorney, Michael Cohen, to an adult film star, Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford.
40% : The immunity picture is made more complicated, though, by the prospect that Trump will now be entitled to protection not only by virtue of being the 45th president, but also because he will serve as the 47th.
40% : In the immunity case, Trump v. United States, the high court warned of the "'unique risks' that arise when the President's energies are diverted by proceedings that might render him 'unduly cautious in the discharge of his official duties.'" Languishing behind bars could amount to such a diversion on presidential energies.
32% : The task of sentencing Trump for those convictions falls to Judge Merchan, whose stewardship of the trial was marked by acrimony between the jurist and the defendant, on whom he imposed a prior restraint on speech.
30% : Judge Merchan, though, could elect to sentence Trump anyway -- and dare the high court to act.
20% : Trump lamented that the judge was "wrongfully attempting to deprive me of my First Amendment Right to speak out against the Weaponization of Law Enforcement"Judge Merchan did agree with Trump's request to delay sentencing until after last week's election.
16% : Now that circumstances have changed, he could reckon that Trump's electoral victory upends the logic of sentencing Trump to prison -- the usual punishment for a felonious conviction.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link