Honolulu Civil Beat Article RatingGabbard's Past Could Complicate US Senate Confirmation
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
36% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-12% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
37% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
72% : She was first interviewed by Trump for a possible role in his first administration after his surprise 2016 election.47% : The position Trump nominated her for, director of national intelligence, requires Senate confirmation.
37% : "Ward added the primary reason Gabbard was selected is her allegiance to Trump.
14% : In December 2019, Gabbard was the only Democrat to vote "present", which amounts to abstaining from a vote, in the House decision to impeach Trump for abuse of power and obstruction of Congress for his attempts to get Ukraine to investigate Biden.
4% : While Trump praised Gabbard in a statement Wednesday as someone who "has broad support" from both political parties, she fared poorly in her race for president as a Democrat in 2020 and was a harsh critic of Hillary Clinton's campaign in 2016 and that of Kamala Harris this year.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.