Washington Post Article RatingTrump pick resurfaces questions about Tulsi Gabbard's 2017 Syria visit
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
85% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-2% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-25% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : Gabbard, who left the Democratic Party and later declared that she was a Republican, became a close adviser to Trump during his 2024 campaign.15% : She has repeatedly described Trump as a liar and a hypocrite for his actions in Syria.
5% : Trump said the Syrian attack on "innocent civilians" was "horrible" and caused a "slow and brutal death for so many."Gabbard called the U.S. strike "dangerous, rash and unconstitutional" and said Trump had acted "recklessly."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.