'Shameless' MSNBC hosts Joe Scarborough, Mika Brzezinski blasted for...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

44% : ""Bend the knee to the King in order to save their careers," a person wrote on X.Another site user added, "Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski didn't go to Mar-a-Lago to achieve unity with Trump.
40% : Then one morning you wake up and hear Comrade Mika admit that they bent the knee to Trump.
33% : "Hitler getting a lot more meeting requests than I would've thought," Republican strategist Scott Jennings wrote on X, referring to the co-hosts' past attacks on Trump.
24% : Addressing the expected backlash over news of their face-to-face, Scarborough insisted during his opening monologue that the co-hosts -- who have previously accused the Republican of being a threat to democracy -- weren't trying to "normalize" Trump.
22% : Another X user chimed in, "Imagine being a liberal and listening to Morning Joe and Mika tell you for years that Trump is a threat to democracy...
21% : The defeated MSNBC anchors -- who have slammed Trump in the past as a "fascist" and compared him to Adolf Hitler -- had a face-to-face with the winning Republican at his Mar-a-Lago estate Friday to "restart communications" after conceding that Americans had overwhelmingly made their choice by re-electing him.
21% : Democrats never actually thought Trump was Hitler or a fascist dictator.
7% : Washington Examiner Chief Political Correspondent Byron York tweeted, "Annals of shamelessness: They call Trump a fascist, and much, much more, and then, just 22 days after his 'Nazi-like' rally, they fly to Florida for an audience."Eli Lake, a Free Press columnist, wrote, "Why would Trump bother talking to these people other than to urge them to seek mental health counseling?"Critics came out in droves to accuse the lefty anchors of hypocrisy after years of repeatedly bashing the Republican on-air.
6% : Joe and Mika who constantly attack 'fascist' Trump on their show, went to Mar a Lago to talk with Trump over the weekend.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.