GREGG JARRETT: Bragg and Merchan's vindictive lawfare strategy against Trump failed. Can this go on till 2029?

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

39% : He has had more than four months to consider the pending defense motion to dismiss the case based on the Supreme Court's decision on July 1 that Trump had broad and presumptive immunity from prosecution for official acts as president.
35% : Bragg's case against Trump was always incoherent, principally because it is not a crime to conceal a perfectly legal non-disclosure agreement.
29% : In a Draconian edict, the judge unconstitutionally silenced Trump with a gag order, thereby constraining the Republican nominee from defending himself in the court of public opinion in advance of the 2024 election.
24% : The inexorable consequence is that Trump was deprived of the right to properly defend himself from the alleged underlying crimes because Bragg's prosecutors never fully disclosed which ones were supposedly violated.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.