Once again, polls underestimated Trump. Experts only have a hunch why
- Bias Rating
30% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
30% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
74% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-41% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-29% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
68% : With vote tallies nearly finalized, Trump led Harris nationally by 2 percentage points: 50% to 48%.59% : (Reuters/Ipsos polling showed Harris leading Trump by 1 percentage point just ahead of the Nov. 5 election, in line with the 538 average of national polls.)
56% : Polls before the Nov. 5 vote had shown Trump trailing Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris by 1 percentage point, according to an average of dozens of national opinion polls compiled by 538, a website on data analysis for politics and sports.
48% : In the Rust Belt swing states of Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Michigan - where Trump was behind in the surveys but won the vote - the polling averages similarly underestimated him by 2 to 3 points.
38% : Public opinion polls underestimated Trump support by 3 percentage points*Misses are marginal, but polls have underestimated Trump in three election cycles*Pollsters look to revise their approachBy Jason LangeWASHINGTON, Nov 20 (Reuters) -
37% : Public opinion polls did not similarly underestimate Republican strength heading into the 2018 and 2022 congressional midterm elections when Trump wasn't on the ballot, said Franklin.
29% : The American Association for Public Opinion Research postmortem following the 2020 election considered the possibility that polls underestimated Trump because his supporters responded less to surveys, consistent with his brand as a political outsider.
25% : TRUMP EFFECTPolling experts told Reuters they remain unsure of why polls underestimate Trump, who has railed against polls as biased against him throughout his political career.
17% : Polling experts and pollsters also say it is possible that pollsters are also introducing errors when they process their surveys' raw numbers to give more weight to the responses coming from people they consider most likely to actually vote.FINE-TUNINGMeasuring support for Trump seems to be a particular problem for pollsters.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.