Donald Trump, please get rid of Matt Gaetz and Tulsi Gabbard from...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

52% : Does Trump want to spend his last two years in the White House how he spent most of his first four, fending off investigations and hearings from deranged House Democrats?Cutting Gaetz and Gabbard now shows a willingness to work with allies in the Senate, and it saves countless headaches in the future.
51% : But Trump also understands Teddy Roosevelt's maxim of speaking softly with a big stick.
47% : Neither Gabbard nor Gaetz are singular figures for what Trump wants to accomplish.
37% : They're distracting chaos agents who won't accomplish what Trump wants them to, and will most likely backfire on his agenda.
36% : Which is why Trump shouldn't be so insistent that recess appointments be used to install his choices.
36% : We can see the affinity -- Trump opposed the Iraq war and wants to limit our foreign escapades, as does she.
32% : The congressman may have convinced Trump that he is the subject of "lawfare," but it's obvious all he wants is an escape hatch.
31% : And Gaetz's own run-in with the law diminishes how the Dems relentlessly hounded Trump.
29% : After years of Russia, Russia, Russia, no one has more reason to dislike the Department of Justice than Trump.
25% : Trump is wasting important political capital pushing two mediocre nominees out of stubbornness, not necessity.
23% : No matter how much Trump might accomplish in the next two years, if the Democrats can take the House and the Senate because of voter backlash, the entire agenda grinds to a halt.
22% : Trump has shown that he can balance the demands of a threatening world while working to avoid dragging America into another unnecessary war.
21% : But he should consider how the needless battles of today can impact him -- and his legacy -- tomorrow.Which brings us to the reason Trump is pushing so hard for recess appointments: Matt Gaetz and Tulsi Gabbard.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.