The Guardian Article RatingWhy Milosevic blinked first
- Bias Rating
-22% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
10% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
-30% Somewhat Liberal
- Politician Portrayal
4% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
33% Positive
- Liberal
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
60% : This news was then relayed to EU officials that night gathering in Cologne for their twice-yearly summit.52% : He realised Nato troops, albeit under UN command, would be required to enter Kosovo.
52% : The force would act under UN authority.
51% : Milosevic had been informed of the contents of the documents by the Russians before the meeting began, but to make a political point he won assurances that the force would be acting under UN authority and Serbia would remain sovereign over Kosovo.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.