Elias: Vance's Bay Area connections all but guaranteed him his veep post
- Bias Rating
10% Center
- Reliability
25% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-11% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
15% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
56% : His access to billionaires in the San Francisco suburbs may have attracted Trump to him as much as anything else.47% : Sacks sat beside Trump last summer at a $300,000-per-person fundraising dinner on San Francisco's Nob Hill, where Trump informally polled the room on his choice for veep.
46% : For Vance, Trump has become the cat's pajamas now that he's made Vance nationally prominent.
40% : Before, Vance just didn't understand, but now he does, Trump told those who asked.
36% : Vance did, after all, write on Facebook in 2016 that "I go back and forth between thinking Trump is a cynical a -- -e like Nixon who wouldn't be that bad (and might even prove useful) or that he's America's Hitler."
15% : Vance also declared Trump to be "reprehensible" and "an idiot."
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.