Trump Star Power Key to White House Win
- Bias Rating
44% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
20% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
74% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-30% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
39% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
66% : Few politicians are capable of ginning up the kind of popular support Trump found in spades.57% : (It should not need saying, but since it does: The point here isn't that storming the Capitol is good -- it is obviously not -- but this is illustrative of a commitment to Trump that few other political figures could match.)
51% : Perhaps someone like Trump could win with a different electoral coalition with a different platform.
50% : Trump came within 43,000 votes in three states of winning a second term, which was a key indication that he was going to be formidable in a rematch once the pandemic was over but inflation had begun.
49% : And there is obviously an emotional connection Trump forged with his hardcore supporters that transcends ideology or policy.
43% : The reason this is once again relevant is that Trump has for the second time around tried to assemble a Cabinet more representative of the coalition that elected him.
42% : But it does mean senators should perhaps more seriously grapple with how Trump won and what that means for the Republican future, even if they find some of his new political allies odd (or worse).
36% : But these things explain why Trump wins when Blake Masters does not.
36% : But not the coalition Trump actually put together to win the White House twice.
33% : But it probably is to carry a purple state, which Trump was able to do much more often than Republican Senate candidates.
30% : It beggars belief that Trump would win the Rust Belt based on fame and bravado alone if he were running on Social Security privatization, free trade, and amnesty for illegal immigrants.
20% : I'm not a big fan of the PRO Act myself and suspect Trump and RFK Jr. will eventually find themselves in conflict.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.