Everyone's saying the same about Mark Zuckerberg's meeting with Trump
- Bias Rating
84% Very Conservative
- Reliability
10% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
100% Very Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-45% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-22% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
49% : The 40-year-old Meta CEO declined to offer his opinion on the matter Friday during an interview on 'The Circuit with Emily Chang' at Meta headquarters in Menlo Park, California, but did praise Trump for surviving his widely seen assassination attempt a few days before'Seeing Donald Trump get up after getting shot in the face and pump his fist in the air with the American flag is one of the most badass things I've ever seen in my life,' Zuckerberg, 40, said during an interview at Meta HQ in Menlo Park, California, in July.40% : The two are pictured together at the White House in 2019, before the Facebook founder barred Trump from the platform.
38% : 'Trump must not trust Zuckerberg,' the account went on to insist - calling Zuckerberg 'a fair weather friend.'Others posted memes poking fun at what many framed as a show of weakness from the Harvard-educated billionaire, whose estimated $200billion net worth has him safely at fourth on Forbes' billionaire list.
34% : More specific details behind the talks remain unknownMeanwhile, a spokesperson for Meta confirmed the dinner between Zuckerberg and Trump on Wednesday, saying he and other members of his team had been invited to talk about the incoming administration.
24% : 'So Mark Zuckerberg censored conservatives and Trump let's[sic]
23% : That spawned several instances of censorship, leading Trump to paint Zuckerberg as part of a plot against him to rig the race.
18% : Four years ago, the 40-year-old Facebook founder famously banned Trump, 78, from the platform over claims the 2020 election was stolen.
11% : He was reinstated last yearOnlookers are accusing the Meta boss of using the meet to pander to the president-elect - with this one referencing claims of censorship during the 2020 election, which Trump said was 'stolen''Zuckerberg went to [M]ar-a-largo[sic] to tell Trump he has changed his ways and wants to work with Trump?' one X user wrote.
10% : In August, he also complained how senior Biden administration officials pressured Facebook to 'censor' specific COVID-19 content during the pandemic - something he said he now regretsA spokesperson for Meta confirmed the dinner between Zuckerberg and Trump on Wednesday, saying he and other members of his team had been invited to talk about the incoming administration.
1% : He needs to be investigated for censorship and election interference!''No, Trump should not pay [K]amala's debt, Trump should not pardon Hunter, and Trump should show no mercy to Zuckerberg,' wrote another, referencing in part how Trump has teased paying of the reported $20 million racked up by the campaign of Kamala Harris.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.