TownhallHere's Why Mark Zuckerberg Had Dinner With Trump At Mar-a-Lago
- Bias Rating
-6% Center
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
2% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-31% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
24% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
89% : He called me after the event and he said that was really amazing," Trump said in August.59% : "A Meta spokesperson said that Zuckerberg was "grateful" to be invited to Mar-a-Lago for dinner to meet with Trump.
35% : Trump adviser Stephen Miller confirmed Trump and Zuckerberg's meeting, saying that the Facebook founder views Trump's second term as a chance at "national renewal" in the country.
30% : Before the election, he told Trump that he wasn't going to support a Democrat and apologized for Meta censoring the photos of the incoming president with his fist in the air.
14% : He also suspended Trump from Facebook for two years.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.