Tucson Sentinel Article RatingTrump-era Border Patrol chief tapped to lead CBP - Click pic for more:
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
40% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-24% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
18% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
72% : When Scott was promoted to chief, Mark Morgan, then the acting commissioner of CBP said Scott brought "an exceptional depth and breadth of experience" to the position.69% : Vitello has been with ICE for 23 years and currently oversees training, equipment, and policy at ICE.
46% : CBP has not had a Senate-confirmed leader since November 2022 when Chris Magnus resigned, bowing to internal pressure after he pushed for major reforms at the federal agency.
41% : Meanwhile, ICE has been led by acting directors since January 2017 when Sarah Saldaña, an Obama-era appointee, stepped down from her position.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.