Letters to the editor for Sunday, December 8, 2024

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

76% : Trump has bragged that he is entitled to touch women's private parts because he is a star.
50% : Lou Walker, Cape CoralRemember the common refrain from many on the Left referring to Trump.
48% : Human emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels have risen to more than 35 billion metric tons per year, while volcanoes produce less than 1 billion metric tons annually.
48% : Beat that, socialist planners!I have no arguments against the educational shortcomings mentioned.
46% : The cost of implementing such a program would also require significant government expenditure.
44% : Garland (via Obama) has targeted Trump from the beginning and truly weaponized the Justice Department at every opportunity.
42% : I do not agree that Trump has been given a mandate by the people to implement Project 2025, to consolidate power in the executive branch, or to undo the balance of power in our three branches of government as outlined in the Constitution of the United States of America.
38% : The clearly unqualified Pet Hegseth has been nominated by Trump to be his secretary of Defense.
37% : But Trump will be facing other new challenges in his second term: a much more incompetent administration.
35% : The common argument from some is that Trump pardoned his son-in-law's father.
28% : Or is it wrong just for Trump.
27% : Trump would clean them out without a second thought.
24% : Trump granted this conniving criminal clemency.
22% : Democrats have spent years attacking Trump with lines such as "No One is Above the Law!"
18% : But Trump says "no," and Trump has never lied.
13% : So, if Hunter was only prosecuted for "political reasons," what's Biden's excuse for having Trump prosecuted?

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.