Roll Call Article Rating

Justices agree to hear dispute over California emissions rules - Roll Call

  • Bias Rating

    6% Center

  • Reliability

    15% ReliablePoor

  • Policy Leaning

    -2% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -61% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

34% Positive

  •   Liberal
  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : The case now on the Supreme Court's docket -- Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. EPA -- has its roots in the state's latest emissions plan, which received the latest EPA waiver in 2022.
46% : They have "serious constitutional concerns with a statute that allows only California to act as a junior-varsity EPA," the challengers said, citing a 2022 Supreme Court decision restricting how agencies could act on "major questions" of political and economic significance without a clear statement from Congress.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link