NY judge upholds Trump hush money conviction despite Supreme Court's immunity ruling
- Bias Rating
50% Medium Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
50% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-63% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-32% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
48% : "The sooner these hoaxes end, the sooner our country can unite behind President Trump for the betterment of all Americans.40% : Trump and his lawyers had asked Merchan to set aside his hush money trial conviction on the basis of the Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity last summer.
36% : If Merchan's ruling is upheld, Trump will make history on January 20, 2025, as the first criminal felon to occupy the White House and serve as president.
34% : In his ruling, Merchan sided with prosecutors from the Manhattan district attorney's office who said that while the U.S. Supreme Court granted presidents wide latitude in having immunity for presidential actions, the activities for which Trump was convicted were unofficial - not official - conduct.
34% : "Trump spokesperson Steven Cheung issued a statement soon after Merchan's ruling that didn't specifically say he would appeal the ruling - but that he would continue to fight what he described as a political "witch hunt" that was in direct violation of the Supreme Court's decision on immunity "and other longstanding jurisprudence.""This lawless case should have never been brought, and the Constitution demands that it be immediately dismissed, as President Trump must be allowed to continue the Presidential Transition process, and execute the vital duties of the presidency, unobstructed by the remains of this, or any other, Witch Hunt," Cheung said.
25% : But the ruling was seen as a potentially even bigger gift to Trump because one portion of it, which deals with trial evidence, raised questions about the criminal trial Trump already lost.
23% : The judge's decision shoots down only one of several efforts by Trump to wipe clean his record of the criminal felonies before he returns to the White House on Jan. 20.
23% : Merchan wrote in his 41-page ruling that the actions Trump took for which he was convicted were "decidedly personal acts" including falsifying business records that posed "no danger of intrusion on the authority and function of the Executive Branch," including Trump's actions as president.
21% : Trump was convicted in Manhattan on May 30 of 34 counts of falsifying business records in order to conceal a conspiracy to unlawfully interfere in the 2016 presidential election through a scheme involving hush money paid to Daniels.
20% : Separately, Trump has asked Judge Juan Merchan to dismiss the entire New York criminal case as a result of his November election victory.
7% : Those "unofficial" actions included steps Trump took to falsify records related to payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels, who was threatening to go public with claims of having had affairs with Trump just before the 2016 election, Merchan concluded.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.