The Fani Willis Trump fiasco is far from over. In fact, it's just getting started

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

44% : Instead, Trump wanted to win the 2020 election, which is not illegal; fighting to stay in office would have ended one way or the other by inauguration day in 2021.
41% : BECAUSE HER CASE AGAINST TRUMP WAS 'WEAK,' ATTORNEY SAYSWillis, in a striking example of prosecutorial overreach, charged Trump and his associates with running a vast RICO conspiracy that included almost every significant act of his campaign between Election Day 2020 and the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, and beyond.
38% : While the Trump Court held that courts should not allow any evidence, even when used to prove state crimes, from official presidential activities, it did not prohibit state prosecutors from proceeding against Trump.
37% : Neither Trump nor his co-defendants tried to gain money, property, or control of a business with their post-2020 election activities.
36% : Other prosecutors, such as Manhattan D.A. Alvin Bragg or U.S. Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith, lodged narrow, if creative, charges against Trump that they hoped would be easier to prove.
35% : But once Willis brought charges against Trump for his actions while in office, future presidents must factor prosecution into their calculus.
34% : This not only ran afoul of the First Amendment free speech rights of Trump, the co-defendants, and the Republican Party, it also posed a threat to all future presidents, who would have to worry about state legal liabilities when making the most difficult decisions in the nation and engaging in his duties.
33% : The Court held that Willis suffered from a conflict of interest because she hired her paramour, Nathan Wade, as a special counsel to investigate Trump.
33% : There was never any question that Willis suffered from a conflict of interest; but like the other prosecutors who pursued Trump in the name of democracy, she threw all caution to the wind.
31% : Willis's prosecution was part of the Democratic Party's plan to break political and legal norms that had held for the history of the republic - all in the name of defeating Trump.
24% : But the most serious flaw with Willis's now-disgraced prosecution of Trump was its threat to the office of the presidency.
18% : While Democrats may embrace state prosecutors like Bragg and Willis, they should instead consider the whirlwind that they have now unleashed and choose to do the right thing: drop their legally flawed cases against President Trump.
14% : TRUMP CHEERS DISQUALIFICATION OF 'CORRUPT' FANI WILLIS, SAYS CASE IS 'ENTIRELY DEAD'After the 2016 election, the Hillary Clinton campaign and allied liberal groups recruited celebrities and others to importune electors to not cast their electoral votes for Trump; again, no one was investigated or charged.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.