Michael Goodwin: White House aides were hiding Biden's mental...

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

59% : In fact, the fear-mongering tone employed against Trump remains remarkable compared towith the soft-glove, see-no-evil coverage of Biden.
37% : And with Trump set to enter the Oval Office again, the war against him is already raging.
35% : They weren't fairly and accurately holding Trump accountable -- they were using all their power and tools to swing the election to Biden.
33% : Editors used to provide a counterweight by having a knowledge of history and by insisting on standards of fairness, but those standards were abandoned soon after Trump entered the 2016 race.
31% : Although public resistance to Trump is not nearly as feverish as it was before his first term and the Dems' slurs that he is the new Hitler have disappeared, there is no sign that the media intends to cover him more fairly.
30% : The other part is the nasty, distorted coverage of Trump.
28% : Most of them knew better because the FBI already had authenticated the laptop's hard drive's contents, but they, too, were willing to sell their credibility to help defeat Trump.
26% : Another effect is the requirement to hate Trump and his supporters.
21% : The world is in flames, the nation is angrily divided, the failing president and the daffy vice president are in hiding-and yet Trump is the problem.
6% : Last June, weeks after the Journal reported that people who had seen Biden said he was slipping, the whole world saw what a mess he was in the disastrous debate with Donald Trump.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.