The Paul Festivus Report: A Great Start for DOGE
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
90% ReliableExcellent
- Policy Leaning
58% Medium Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-45% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-7% Negative
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
33% : Paul says in the report, "As always, taking the path to fiscal responsibility is often a lonely journey, but I've been fighting government waste like DOGE before DOGE was cool."With the knowledge of what's in this report, and how offensive it is to our sensibilities and our wallets, Rand Paul and the Department of Government Efficiency should take chainsaw to this God-forsaken and untenable federal government, Javier Milei-style: Take no prisoners.16% : As we inch closer to Donald Trump's second term, Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are set to lead a new commission, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which vows to radically cut government spending and waste, with Musk even eyeing $2 trillion in cuts.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.