Intelligence community's COVID-19 origins division ran deeper than previously thought - Washington Examiner

  • Bias Rating

    Center

  • Reliability

    55% ReliableFair

  • Policy Leaning

    8% Center

  • Politician Portrayal

    -29% Negative

Bias Score Analysis

The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.

Sentiments

Overall Sentiment

25% Positive

  •   Conservative
SentenceSentimentBias
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan.

Bias Meter

Extremely
Liberal

Very
Liberal

Moderately
Liberal

Somewhat Liberal

Center

Somewhat Conservative

Moderately
Conservative

Very
Conservative

Extremely
Conservative

-100%
Liberal

100%
Conservative

Bias Meter

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

54% : An EcoHealth Alliance project proposed to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, or DARPA, through the Department of Defense that would have been at least in part conducted at the Wuhan Institute of Virology would have genetically added a furin cleavage site to a bat coronavirus, making it more infectious to humans.
48% : "We uncovered evidence of undue political and personal influence, in addition to the scientific influence detailed in this compelling piece by the Wall Street Journal," Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH), chairman of the subcommittee, told the Washington Examiner.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.

Copy link