Shifting Sands: South Korea's Future and Navigating Trump 2.0

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

75% : Yes, Lee understands that establishing a strong working relationship with President Trump and his circle is essential for South Korea's national interests.
68% : He will approach Trump with sincerity and an open mind, with the outcome largely contingent on Trump's readiness for serious negotiations.
57% : Unlike Yoon, who was ideologically rigid and politically inexperienced, Lee is a seasoned pragmatist with extensive political and administrative experience.
49% : Would Lee be able to form a working relationship with Trump?
43% : If Trump is willing to engage in meaningful dialogue, Lee will reciprocate, and vice versa.
43% : Despite the setback of the 2019 Hanoi Summit, Trump is known to have maintained contact with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
41% : The Yoon administration branded antiwar protesters and supporters of engagement policies and peace initiatives as pro-North Korean sympathizers or agents.
39% : For him, members of the National Assembly who passed impeachment motions against his cabinet, cut government budgets, or enacted bills unfavorable to his administration were deemed anti-state forces.
38% : The second concern regards the possibility of President Trump striking a direct deal with North Korea.
34% : South Korea would be alarmed if Trump were to negotiate an agreement exchanging U.S. sanctions relief and diplomatic normalization for North Korea's suspension or reduction of its nuclear forces and related activities, coupled with incremental denuclearization.
32% : The second, asserting its voice, may prove ineffective with a president as adept at transactional deals and bluffing as Trump.
32% : Any advice to President Trump in dealing with nuclear North Korea?Regarding North Korea's nuclear weapons, we need to make a distinction between recognition and awareness.
24% : First, there is a fear that Trump 2.0 could disrupt or weaken the ROK-U.S. alliance, either by making excessive demands for defense cost-sharing or by threatening to reduce or withdraw American forces from South Korea.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.