How FDR built the the American security state
- Bias Rating
36% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
60% ReliableFair
- Policy Leaning
-10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-33% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-18% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
54% : The administration largely refused to do the latter, but officials walked a fine line that allowed them to keep the anti-racists in their coalition: Some Democrats sponsored unsuccessful anti-lynching legislation, Roosevelt occasionally spoke against lynching, and he met with anti-lynching activists.53% : In Roosevelt's case, those state-building exercises included gun control; the drug war; increased cooperation between federal, state, and local law enforcement; expansion of incarceration; and growing links between domestic police and the national security state.
45% : The notion of "lawlessness" was used to argue these were national problems that called for federal intervention.
20% : Many focus on the ways Presidents Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, and Bill Clinton escalated federal police power.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.