Pentagon Appeals Panel Rules 9/11 Plotters' Plea Deals Can Go Forward
- Bias Rating
34% Somewhat Conservative
- Reliability
70% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
22% Somewhat Conservative
- Politician Portrayal
-28% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
-35% Negative
- Liberal
- Conservative
Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. |
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : A Pentagon appeals panel has upheld a military court judge's decision that the plea deals reached with the three 9/11 plotters being held at Guantanamo prison last August were valid and Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin did not have the authority to rescind the deals with the 9/11 mastermind of the attack, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, and two other terrorists signed off on by prosecutors without Austin's knowledge.49% : Last August, Susan Escallier, the convening authority for military commissions, oversaw the negotiations for plea deals involving the 9/11 terrorists.
46% : "We agree with the military judge that the secretary did not have authority to revoke respondents' existing PTAs because the respondents had started performance of the PTAs," the three-judge panel wrote in a 21-page decision released Monday.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.