Raw Story'What took them so long?' Trump critic batters GOP on CNN after being booted by Party
- Bias Rating
-12% Somewhat Liberal
- Reliability
75% ReliableGood
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-70% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
22% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
58% : Duncan quickly replied, "Yeah, I mean, my first thoughts that came across my mind were, 'What took them so long?' " at which point host Hunt started laughing.23% : Duncan, a frequent critic of Donald Trump after the now-president-elect attempted to tamper with the 2020 presidential election results, was invited on by CNN's Kasie Hunt to address a decision by the state party to banish him, ostensibly because he supported Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 election.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.