Financial Times Article RatingWall Street regulation needs a rethink under Donald Trump
- Bias Rating
-10% Center
- Reliability
10% ReliablePoor
- Policy Leaning
10% Center
- Politician Portrayal
-67% Negative
Continue For Free
Create your free account to see the in-depth bias analytics and more.
Continue
Continue
By creating an account, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Policy, and subscribe to email updates. Already a member: Log inBias Score Analysis
The A.I. bias rating includes policy and politician portrayal leanings based on the author’s tone found in the article using machine learning. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral.
Sentiments
13% Positive
- Liberal
- Conservative
| Sentence | Sentiment | Bias |
|---|---|---|
Unlock this feature by upgrading to the Pro plan. | ||
Reliability Score Analysis
Policy Leaning Analysis
Politician Portrayal Analysis
Bias Meter
Extremely
Liberal
Very
Liberal
Moderately
Liberal
Somewhat Liberal
Center
Somewhat Conservative
Moderately
Conservative
Very
Conservative
Extremely
Conservative
-100%
Liberal
100%
Conservative
Contributing sentiments towards policy:
51% : It should seek to consolidate oversight responsibilities between the regulatory bodies, address inefficiencies between federal and state regulators, and implement tools such as a performance scorecard to assess regulators.47% : Nearly 70 per cent of commercial banks in the US, including SVB and First Republic, operate under a dual regulatory system where state and federal regulators alternate oversight.
47% : Proponents argue this enhances resilience by offering multiple perspectives and reduces political interference by giving banks some choice over their primary regulator.
*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.