Trump Loses It Over Jack Smith Report Accusing Him of 'Unprecedented Criminal Effort'

Contributing sentiments towards policy:

57% : "Smith's report details how Trump himself helped run out the clock on the case thanks to his "ability and willingness to use his influence and following on social media to target witnesses, courts and department employees, which required the office to engage in time-consuming litigation to protect witnesses from threats and harassment.
39% : "In fact, the report was released soon after a temporary injunction issued by Judge Aileen Cannon, whom Trump appointed to the bench in 2020, expired at midnight.
25% : It concluded that if Trump hadn't won re-election, he would have been convicted for his role in the Jan. 6 riot.
23% : Smith was forced to suspend his case when Trump won a second term, thanks to a Department of Justice policy that considers it unconstitutional to prosecute a sitting president.
21% : The Department of Justice didn't release the second volume, which covers allegations that Trump kept and mishandled classified military intelligence after leaving office, because two co-conspirators are still being tried in the case.
18% : In December 2022, the committee -- which included Republicans Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger -- voted to refer Trump to the Department of Justice for prosecution.
13% : After Trump refused to concede his 2020 election to President Joe Biden and a mob of his supporters attacked the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, Congress created the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack to investigate Trump's role in the riot.
13% : "In a separate post, Trump claimed Smith was "desperate" because he released his "Fake findings at 1:00 A.M. in the morning.
6% : Donald Trump lashed out at Jack Smith in a borderline incoherent late-night rant after the special counsel released a report finding Trump was part of an "unprecedented criminal effort" to overturn the 2020 election.

*Our bias meter rating uses data science including sentiment analysis, machine learning and our proprietary algorithm for determining biases in news articles. Bias scores are on a scale of -100% to 100% with higher negative scores being more liberal and higher positive scores being more conservative, and 0% being neutral. The rating is an independent analysis and is not affiliated nor sponsored by the news source or any other organization.